Controversy always surrounds HD Radio, and after
this article I'm sure I'll hear from a few dozen readers who will tell me that
HD is a farce, it can't do anything for radio, and it should be killed
immediately. Even though I released an HD product called Mighty Red last
Christmas (and sold out a couple of thousand units), I too am critical of HD.
There are issues, including some technical issues. But, frankly, most of the
issues are not with the technology, or with the iBiquity people. We, the
industry, are the problem with HD Radio. In the 1970s, FM radio was
commercial-free, was hipper and cooler, was playing album cuts instead of the
top 40, and had alternative-sounding DJs. That approach, thanks in part to FM
pioneers like Lee Abrams, Jim Donohue, Buzz Bennett, Jerry Clifton, and others,
was about knowing what the young generation wanted, finding a way to reflect
that, and putting it on FM. But what are we putting on HD Radio today? And does
it appeal to the generation most likely to embrace something
new? Radio's Biggest
Advertiser And most HD subchannels are an
afterthought. Most are automated (and sound like it), most get no attention from
their PDs (who are already low on time), and few are using live talent, because
of course it's not cost-effective to put live personalities on a channel with no
listeners. That would be the cart before the horse. Maybe HD isn't taking off because
there is simply nothing worth listening to? It seems to me that if we came up
with something that is not researched to death, that is as radical as FM was in
its early days, and that gives HD the feel of being "underground" or offering
something you can't get anywhere else (and that a large audience actually cares
about), HD could take off. Go steal some college radio programmers and let them
dazzle you. Innovation rarely happens in big corporations, which tend to be
risk-averse. If today's owners were in charge when those bold young FM pioneers
were begging for a chance to try their formats on the FM wasteland, I fear FM
would have never taken off and we would be an industry of AM stations
today. HD Radio has the potential to be
as big or bigger than FM was and to create new interest. But only if there is
compelling content. Every radio company with HD Radio
should be promoting it to death, finding a way to get compelling content on the
air, looking for a way to create something listeners can't get anywhere else,
and seeking an edge that will make HD channels appeal to youth culture.
They should be in the face of
every retailer who can sell HD, making sure units are available and that
retailers understand what the benefits are. I'd hold seminars for every
salesperson at every electronics store to educate them about HD in each market.
When I go to stores and ask about HD Radio, no one even knows what I'm talking
about. If you promote it and make it compelling and unique, you will get an
audience. While some will applaud when HD
dies, I think it would be an opportunity lost. What about you? Have you given up
on HD? Are you paying proper attention to your HD channels or just letting them
ride on autopilot? Don't let the opportunity pass. We're in a digital world, and
HD allows radio to do things with digital that can't be done with a radio signal
alone. We should not let it die because of our apathy. Eric Rhoads PLUS: We've added tech guru Eric
Greenspan as emcee, and musician Andy Grammer will
join us to add some color to the event.
HD Is A
Throwaway
Thankfully, most radio groups have embraced HD Radio, but
I dare say many of the HD2 and HD3 subchannels are throwaways. If HD is to gain
any consumer interest, there must be a good reason to buy the technology,
especially if the technology is a lot more expensive than a non-HD receiver.
Splat, Splat, Splat
What is the advantage of HD
Radio? It sounds better, and it can do some cool digital and interactive things.
But does it sound that much better than FM? Enough that a consumer can tell a
difference? I'm not sure the difference is as noticeable as AM vs. FM was,
but the better sound
could still be an advantage.
But many of the stations I'm listening to
on HD are playing MP3s instead of higher-quality .WAV files, making the
difference in sound less noticeable. Somewhere along the line it was not
communicated that if your source is an MP3, with the sound of splattering highs
and drums, your HD signal will output garbage as well. (Frankly, no FM should be
playing MP3s either. They don't sound good.)
Though quality is a starting point, a bigger issue is
that the extensive marketing isn't getting noticed. The stations I've heard
running HD Radio spots don't seem to be touting what the difference is with HD.
Nor are they trying to use their existing HD listeners as a viral tool to sell
more interest in the technology to others. Yes, many stations are running spots,
and the HD Radio Alliance was one of radio's biggest advertisers last year, but
most consumers still don't know or care about the technology There is a
disconnect somewhere.
Nothing Worth Listening To?
HD
Radio is the unwanted child of FM. Most managers I talk to run it because they
are told to run it, but few believe in it. Too many HD channels are sub-content
from a more mainstream format (for instance, a specific decade). Or they're
formats that can no longer make it in the mainstream, or dog formats that may
appeal to a small segment of an FM's audience.
The Unwanted Radio
Child
In the 1940s-1970s, FM was the unwanted child of AM. No one
could make a dime on an FM station, and they were considered just a nuisance
(sound familiar?). Thankfully, there were some young, brash programmers who
talked some owners into letting them try something new. They brought about the
real birth of FM, after it had been a wasteland of elevator music for 30 years.
Where are those young, brash programmers today, and why aren't we letting them
invent something new for HD?
If You Build It, They Won't Come
Last week
iBiquity CEO Bob Struble stated that HD can help radio grow. He's right, but HD
won't move the needle unless there is compelling content. At the moment, HD is
nothing more than an annoyance to some GMs and owners, just like FM was, and
I've even heard rumors that some groups have turned off their HD signals just to
save power (if this is true, let me know).
It's The Content, Stupid
Struble
is right, but radio isn't buying it because they're focusing on the wrong
things. HD Radio success isn't about the distribution method, what it can do
digitally, or even its improved audio fidelity. It's about the content, and how
much attention we pay to the content. Features don't make money unless there are
audiences attached. Programmers have proven that a crummy fringe signal can be
number one in a market if the content is better than everything
else.
Cart Before The Horse?
Too often I hear "We
will pay more attention to HD Radio once there are more HD receivers in the
marketplace." Many said the same about FM too. I know one man who turned his FM
back to the FCC because he thought it was useless to own. But a few brave souls
created great radio brands, some of which have lasted 40 years now, because they
put content first. Why not go to the local college, find some kids who want to
change the world, turn the HD signal over to them and say, "Anything goes, as
long as you don't lose the license"?
Building The Car Without
Going To The Race
What radio company is really behind HD? Signing
up, going to the expense of converting to the equipment, increasing your
electric bill, and having one more format to be responsible for is a commitment.
But it's not enough of a commitment. It's like buying the best race car and
forgetting to show up at the race.
I'd love to hear examples of stations with actual HD
successes, but frankly, if they're out there, I've heard nothing. As an
industry, our priority is still survival, and HD is just another thing to go on
the back burner -- until it finally burns out.
PS: We have
a killer lineup at our Convergence
Conference, June 3-4 at the Microsoft campus in Mountain View, CA:
Guy Kawasaki returns with a new, expanded session on "The
Art Of Social Network Marketing"
Best-selling author Jeffrey
Eisenberg, on the real strategies for social media success
Promote A Book founder Michael Drew's
acclaimed "Pendulum" presentation explains how entrepreneurs can take advantage
of cyclical the shifts in societal attitudes
Rob
Curley of Greenspun Media Group and the Las Vegas Sun,showcases
innovative new ideas for hyperlocalism
Kurt
Hanson, founder and Publisher of RAIN and CEO of AccuRadio,
with his highly anticipated "State of the Industry"
talk
Mark Ramsey lays out his vision for
radio in the days ahead
Gordon Borrell,
with the facts on who is doing the best at bringing in interactive revenues, and
how they're doing it
Click here
to register for
Convergence 2010, or call 561-655-8778.
AND....
Did
you know we have a pre-Convergence conference called the Radio Tech
Summit? It's being held right before
Radio Ink Convergence and will deal with the issues of HD Radio and other
technical issues related to radio. Please join us. We start on June 2. To learn
more, go to www.radioink.com/techsummit, or click
here to register.
Recent Comments