$250 million. That's all Amazon CEO Jeffrey Bezos paid for the Washington Post, which was once worth several billion dollars.
$70 million. That's all John Henry paid on Friday for the Boston Globe, a paper the New York Times acquired for $1.1 billion in 1993.
Next to nothing. That's what IBT Media paid to buy Newsweek over the weekend from IAC, which itself had paid only $1 plus $40 million in pension obligations to buy it two years ago.
Some billionaires like cars, yachts and private jets. Others like newspapers.
Figuring the math, it's hard to justify even a $250 million
valuation for the Post. The company reported that it lost nearly $50
million for the first half of the year on newspaper operations that
generated $138.4 million in revenue. Of that $50 million loss, nearly
$40 million was in non-cash pension expense. So you could argue that the
company lost only $10 million on operations. But it lost $33 million in
the first half of 2012, too, also including pension costs. Circulation
fell about 7 percent in the first half of 2013. At the end of last year,
the company valued its newspaper assets at $293.6 million. That turned
out to be too optimistic.
Listening to the Bezos buzz
has been fun following his announcement that he intends to buy -- and
save -- the Post. Of course, pundits have explored every angle, from his
political agenda and desire to keep the Post producing quality content
to his wanting to take a step toward creating a media empire. What I
find most entertaining, however, are the "Internet generation" people
laughing at how an Internet pioneer is buying old school "dead-tree"
media like newspapers. As if it's a stupid move. Jeff Bezos is not
stupid.
Rob Curley, who formerly headed the online division at the
Washington Post, once told me a story about the reason the paper was
failing. He suggested that the Post's downfall was that it was being
operated by newspaper people who were not willing to let go of their
preconceived notions about the way things had to be done. It's a curse
we all have when we've grown up in an industry.
The Post had hired Curley, the most brilliant online newspaper specialist in the world (now at the Orange County Register). Yet Curley was handcuffed because the newspaper had to run stories first, before they could be put online. Rob would have stories within moments of their happening but was told not to post them until after the newspaper had been delivered the following morning. If it seems silly, well, it was. But there are stories like that at just about every newspaper in the world, and in some places it's probably still going on. When we have always done things a certain way, it's nearly impossible to let go of the way we feel "things should be done" and be willing to cannibalize our own products.
So why will Bezos win? Simply put, he does not think like a newspaperman, he thinks like an Internet mogul. Rather than a newspaper doing Internet, the Post will become an online company that happens to do news very well. The Post has a giant brand, and Bezos understands how to turn that giant brand into a giant Internet business. Will he even continue to print the paper? Probably, but my guess is that he will rethink the print portion, how it is used, and how it can be linked to and rooted in everything online. Perhaps Jeff will give each subscriber a Kindle Fire, which he can provide for less than fulfilling print to all subscribers' homes for a year. He then cuts his print distribution costs, sells the presses for scrap metal, and benefits by having more Kindles in market.
The most broken part of the newspaper model isn't the news, it's the paper -- the cost of paper, the cost of press, and the antiquated distribution model. But the most valuable asset the Post possesses is not its subscriber base or the remaining 50 percent of its former readership, its strength is the trust it has earned worldwide. The Post will become a giant news source for America, much like the New York Times.
Jeff Bezos and others like him understand that brands are valuable consumer assets and that those brands can be maximized with smart technology. Imagine the power of owning the top news brand in every town in America. Imagine being able to buy every paper in America that matters from owners who, in many cases, will be glad to take fire-sale prices. Though Bezos may not need smaller local brands, it would make sense to own the major markets where local trust lies.
If it's not Bezos, some other Internet mogul would be smart to consider the strategy. Maybe Craig Newmark of Craigslist, who singlehandedly brought down newspapers' biggest income stream.
Those of us in the radio industry are still struggling with how radio will remove itself from its debt mess and recover in the future. Perhaps we should look at what is happening to the Post and consider what our future may look like. Everyone seems to be wondering how Bob Pittman will save Clear Channel from its giant debt, yet Pittman, like Bezos, is not a radio man running a radio group. Though he started in radio, he is an Internet mogul running a radio group and thus he sees opportunity differently than most of us do.
Though I don't think Pittman's plan is to make Clear Channel an Internet-only company, he certainly has laid the foundation with iHeart if it's ever needed. Clear Channel is on the path to becoming a media giant, and it will look very different five years from now.
Will Bezos or others like him set foot in radio? I think it's a strong possibility. When every online radio company -- Pandora, Slacker, and others -- craves our audience loyalty and our ad revenues, someone with vision will see how they can transform radio, just by not thinking like radio people.
And if newspapers, radio stations, cable operators, and others from "traditional media" would stop thinking like traditional media, we might be able to turn that to our advantage on our own. Though we all possess tremendous experience and resources, it is that same experience that often prevents us from thinking like Jeff Bezos.
Hello there, I found your blog by way of Google whilst looking for a similar subject, your web site got here up, it appears to be like good. I have bookmarked it in my google bookmarks. Hello there, just was aware of your blog via Google, and found that it is really informative. I am going to watch out for brussels. I will be grateful in the event you continue this in future. Lots of people shall be benefited from your writing. Cheers!
Posted by: cheapest new condo singapore | November 14, 2013 at 12:07 PM
I like the helpful info you provide in your articles. I will bookmark your weblog and check once more right here regularly. I'm fairly sure I'll be told many new stuff proper right here! Best of luck for the following!
Posted by: buy bingo supplies local | November 13, 2013 at 09:46 PM
That's the kind of image that i really thing is super image like. If more images very real like this were out there we'd be super full of graet images in the world.
Posted by: my website | November 03, 2013 at 12:04 PM
Thanks for finally talking about >INK TANK: Why Jeff Bezos Will Revitalize Newspapers
Posted by: vodnyrajvyhne.sk | October 11, 2013 at 12:35 PM
Kamagra is a great, new, and very effective treatment for male Erectile Dysfunction. This medication is extremely helpful and produces outstanding results at a fraction of the cost of most other erectile dysfunction medications. Within this same category of medications, Kamagra achieves the highest praise for its quality and cost.
Posted by: Erectile Dysfunction | October 06, 2013 at 09:36 AM
I want to to thank you for this fantastic read!! I absolutely loved every bit of it. I have got you bookmarked to look at new stuff you post…
Posted by: xtrasize | September 30, 2013 at 08:10 PM
If you are going for best contents like myself, just go to see this website everyday because it offers feature contents, thanks
Posted by: follixin | September 23, 2013 at 02:52 PM
Hey there! This is my first visit to your blog! We are a collection of volunteers and starting a new initiative in a community in the same niche. Your blog provided us useful information to work on. You have done a outstanding job!
Posted by: xtrasize opinioni | September 21, 2013 at 11:49 AM
Yes! Finally something about rada.
Posted by: metadrol | September 19, 2013 at 06:29 PM
I think we're all Bezos on this bus.
Posted by: Steve | August 12, 2013 at 10:37 AM
You are right about Bezos, You are right about the lack of an internet mindset, the cost of paper, ink, and distribution as being the albatross of newspaper companies. I buy books from Amazon, instantly downloaded to my kindle. How much cheaper was it to get that book in the hands of a consumer, vs. printing, distribution, shelf space, retail structures, etc. Just press a button - done. Bezos understands this. If anyone can revitalize the newspaper industry, he can. Now, that said: I still like my glossy magazines for selling fine art!
Posted by: Lee Alban | August 07, 2013 at 10:03 PM
Let's hope, Eric, the new entrepreneurs who are taking over the newspapers succeed - in spades. But, I have different reasons to hope so.
All my education, training and experience points to electronic media being the absolute wrong media to deliver pure content - with any expectations of superior understanding or retention.
The neurology of reading hard copy demonstrates that such a medium impacts on that part of our brains that is conducive to reason and rational thinking. It is also where pure content is retained.
To my mind, to even slow the dumbing down of America (and everywhere else) will be furthered by making the reading of Hard Copy an essential behavior.
We (radio and other electronic media) are, primarily, in the Emotion business. Papers, books and magazines are in the Content business.
Posted by: Ronald T. Robinson | August 07, 2013 at 07:20 PM